site stats

Lachenman v. stice

WebJan 12, 2009 · Appellant's App. p. 190. On December 9, 2003, the Lindseys filed suit against DeGroot Dairy seeking to enjoin the dairy from further operation and for compensation for nuisance, negligence, trespass, criminal mischief, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. DeGroot Dairy filed a motion for summary judgment on September 17, 2007. Webthe fair market value of the animal); see also Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 464 n.12 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (holding that the fair market value of a dog is not limited to its replace …

Lindsey v. DeGroot, 898 N.E.2d 1251 – CourtListener.com

Webv. ) ) Trial Court Case No. CAMERON F. CLARK, IN ) 49D02-1306-MI-016812 . HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ) OF THE INDIANA ) DEPARTMENT OF ) The Honorable ... Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E. 2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) because unlike the dog in . Lachenman, Ms. Liddle’s dog, Copper, has no market value and therefore, Campins v. Capels, WebHis claimed damages were $335. See Appellant s App. p. 20. The measure of damages for the destruction of personal 4 property is the fair market value at the time of loss. … finnish mythology underworld https://adwtrucks.com

DTCI: Intentional infliction of emotional distress - lawcjb.com

WebApr 7, 2013 · Unlike Mitchell, the 2005 case Lachenman v. Stice sought to dramatically expand the available class of personal property for which sentimental value could be recovered. In Lachenman, the plaintiff sought to recover the sentimental value for the loss of her Jack Russell terrier after it was attacked and killed by her neighbor’s German … WebJul 23, 2024 · Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied. Lachenman owned a terrier, but other dogs that belonged to neighbors, the Stices, attacked and killed the … WebBrief of The Humane Society of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant-Plaintiffs’ Petition for Rehearing 6 evidence that Defendants’ farm is causing a physical invasion on Plaintiffs’ property, the Court espn auction draft rankings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF …

Category:Lekens v. Swifty Farms, Inc. - casetext.com

Tags:Lachenman v. stice

Lachenman v. stice

Lindsey v. DeGroot, 898 N.E.2d 1251 – CourtListener.com

WebFeb 1, 2024 · Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. 2005), another case cited by Merin, also generally supports the proposition that the measure of damages for a dog killed is … WebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 461 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). Generally, when a person finds a lost dog, that person acquires good title as against all the world but acquires no title as …

Lachenman v. stice

Did you know?

WebAug 4, 2024 · Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 456 (Ind.Ct.App. 2005) (citation omitted). Rather, liability can be found "only where the conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." WebNov 30, 2005 · Full Case Name: Sean T. LACHENMAN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Chere Lachenman, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Mitchell STICE and Josephine Stice, …

WebFeb 3, 2010 · Lachenman v. Stice , 838 N.E.2d 451, 457 n.5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). However, although intent is a required element, it is not enough that the defendant acted with an … WebRead Imel v. Thomas, 585 N.E.2d 712, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database. All State & Fed. JX. Sign In Get a Demo Free Trial Free Trial ... Summary of this case from Lachenman v. Stice. See 1 Summary. Opinion. No. 71A03-9107-CV-201. February 10, 1992.

WebNov 29, 2005 · Lachenman claims that in the case of Lowell v. Gathright, 97 Ind. 313 (1884), the court upheld an award of $200 for the killing of a dog. To be sure, the plaintiff … WebJan 12, 2009 · Appellant's App. p. 190. On December 9, 2003, the Lindseys filed suit against DeGroot Dairy seeking to enjoin the dairy from further operation and for compensation for nuisance, negligence, trespass, criminal mischief, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. DeGroot Dairy filed a motion for summary judgment on September 17, 2007.

WebLachenman v. Stice: 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.App.) In this Indiana case, a dog owner whose dog was attacked and killed by a neighbor's dog, brought an action against the neighbor to recover veterinary bills and emotional distress damages. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendant-neighbor ...

WebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 467 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). Criminal Theft/Conversion Indiana Code 35-43-4-2 defines the crime of Theft in relevant part as follows: espn authenticateWebMrs. Stice stated in her deposition that it was Lachenman's terrier which was the aggressor. For purposes of summary judgment, however, we must consider the facts in the light … espn athletes body issueWebMay 30, 2003 · Lachenman v. Stice, No. 15A01-0503-CV-113. United States Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana November 30, 2005 ...this vicious propensity at the time of the alleged … espn auburn footballWebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 461 (Ind. App. 2005). Defendant Annette Holdings, Inc. d/ b/a TMC Transportation, Inc. paid and settled the Plaintiff’s claim for property damage … finnish nagant for saleWebLachenman v. Stice , 838 N.E.2d 451, 457 n.5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). However, although intent is a required element, it is not enough that the defendant acted with an intent that is … espn at walt disney worldWebOct 19, 1990 · Read Witham v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co., 561 N.E.2d 484, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database ... Summary of this case from Lachenman v. Stice. See 5 Summaries. Opinion. No. 41S04-9010-CV-678. October 19, 1990. Rehearing Denied December 12, 1990. finnish nagant m39Web699 N.E.2d 689 - FIRSTMARK STANDARD LIFE INS. CO. v. GOSS, Court of Appeals of Indiana. finnish mythology symbols